Data Quality Score¶
Overview¶
The Data Quality (DQ) Score is a normalized, business-relevant measure of data health that provides a single indicator of a dataset's fitness for use. Expressed as a percentage from 0% to 100%, the DQ Score helps organizations quickly assess and monitor the overall quality of their data assets.
Purpose¶
The DQ Score methodology ensures:
- Consistency - Standardized measurement across all data assets
- Normalization - Comparable scores regardless of data volume or complexity
- Business Relevance - Weighted dimensions that reflect organizational priorities
- Actionability - Clear identification of data quality issues requiring attention
Core Dimensions¶
The DQ Score is calculated as a weighted average of four fundamental data quality dimensions:
Completeness¶
Measures the extent to which required data fields are populated.
Metric: Percentage of required fields containing values Score Range: 0-100%
Validity¶
Measures compliance with defined business rules and data constraints.
Metric: Percentage of records passing validation rules Score Range: 0-100%
Freshness (Timeliness)¶
Measures whether data is up-to-date and meets timeliness requirements.
Metric: Binary indicator of freshness incidents Score Range: 0 or 100
Integrity (Incident Health)¶
Measures operational stability through the volume of open data quality incidents.
Metric: Count of open incidents relative to threshold Score Range: 0-100
Score Calculation¶
Normalization Process¶
All source metrics are normalized to scores between 0 and 100 before being integrated into the final DQ Score calculation.
Completeness (S_C)
Directly uses the percentage of populated required fields.
Validity (S_V)
Directly uses the percentage of records passing business rules.
Freshness (S_F)
If No Freshness Incidents: S_F = 100
If Freshness Incidents Exist: S_F = 0 (or configured penalty score, e.g., 80)
Integrity/Incidents (S_Inc)
S_Inc = MAX(0, 100 × (1 - (I_current / I_max)))
Where:
- I_current = Number of open incidents
- I_max = Maximum tolerable incident threshold (default: 20)
Constraints:
- If I_current ≥ I_max, then S_Inc = 0
- If I_current = 0, then S_Inc = 100
Final DQ Score Formula¶
DQ Score = ((S_C × W_C) + (S_V × W_V) + (S_F × W_F) + (S_Inc × W_Inc)) / W_Total
Where:
- S = Normalized dimension score (0-100)
- W = Dimension weight
- W_Total = W_C + W_V + W_F + W_Inc
Output: Value between 0 and 100
Default Weights¶
Data Observability provides industry-standard default weights that prioritize data accuracy and fundamental usability:
| Dimension | Default Weight | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Validity | 40% | Highest priority - measures compliance with critical business rules |
| Completeness | 30% | Second priority - measures availability of required information |
| Integrity (Incidents) | 20% | High priority penalty - reflects operational stability and issue volume |
| Freshness | 10% | Contextual priority - importance varies by use case |
| TOTAL | 100% | Simplifies calculation denominator |
Weight Customization¶
Weights can be adjusted per dataset to reflect specific business requirements:
- Real-time systems: Increase Freshness weight (e.g., 25-30%)
- Analytical systems: Prioritize Completeness and Validity
- Mission-critical systems: Increase Integrity/Incidents weight
Configuration¶
Note
UI-based configuration for DQ Score is coming soon. Configuration is currently available via API only.
Configuration is managed via the DQ Score APIs. The following parameters can be set per dataset:
Dimension Weights¶
Weights can be configured dynamically per dataset. All four weights must sum to 100.
Incident Threshold (I_max)¶
Configure the maximum tolerable incident threshold per dataset:
- Default: 20 open incidents
- Low-tolerance assets: 5-10 incidents
- High-volume assets: 30-50 incidents
The threshold should reflect:
- Dataset criticality
- Typical incident volumes
- Business impact tolerance
Best Practices¶
Interpreting DQ Scores¶
| Score Range | Quality Level | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | Excellent | Maintain current practices |
| 75-89 | Good | Monitor trends, address minor issues |
| 60-74 | Fair | Investigate dimension contributors, plan improvements |
| 0-59 | Poor | Immediate attention required, escalate issues |
To start using this feature, please refer to DQ Score APIs